Opening thoughts: March 22nd

 When we began work to develop a survey of the space that is between and around 

  • Performance Art , Body Art , Live Art 
  • Photographic Self Portraiture or Portrayal
we realised that we needed to listen to as many voices as possible -- the span of alternate names for these practices alone was a sufficient clue. In the Call For Artists we suggested that we should try to develop momentum for a conversation, a dialogue between artists. This blog is intended as a starting point ...

Formulating the call alone was an iterative process and allowed us to understand more about our starting point. Whether it will help in the ongoing remains to be seen.

The initial impetus for this project came from Aldobranti with whom FoscoFornio have previous collaboration history. In his turn he reached out to artists he had previously worked with:

As you may have gathered, my work in photography and identity is closely tied to performativity -- the decisive act in a moment to make an image as statement. This project is about that moment in a performance when the reality of the performance is captured / made real / actualized at the instigation of the performer. I believe that this is an aspect of the performance quite separate from the performance record made by a third-party, because it comes from the active choice of the performer and so becomes of a piece with the performance itself.

He makes the point that the artist in performance has a definite and separate idea of what the act is trying to say, and that this may not be fully revealed in a 3rd party record. Aldobranti focuses on this word performative to look for the force in it. As these conversations progressed, some key concerns began to crystallise -- for a start, the nature of art making as process-oriented as distinct from product-oriented.

I have become aware that in the buzz of talking to dear colleagues / past collaborators that I have not managed to be clear enough. The research area I want to follow through with you is along a boundary where a performance artist in process adopts some part of a self-portraitist's practice. In the moment that the performer images herself the performative impact of that image can shape the record of the performance
OR
an artist working in self-portrait mode switches mode, or relaxes into a place where she begins to perform for the camera. Again I want to interrogate the thought processes here. I think there's something important about the instantaneity of the photographic which arises in the intentional pushing of the shutter.

 Sooner or later the Call had to be published and this is what we went for though regrettably. different listings sites may have constrained us to shorter / abbreviated formats

We are seeking artists and photographers to join a dialogue and survey publication exploring the intersection of performance to camera and photographic self-portraiture. We are interested in artists who work in both fields, as well as those who specialize in one or the other, to participate in a conversation that will explore the overlaps and tensions between these two disciplines. Through this dialogue, we hope to uncover the unique qualities of each form of expression and to better understand how they can inform and enrich each other.
Whether you are a performance artist interested in exploring photographic self-portraiture or a photographer looking to incorporate elements of performance into your work, we invite you to join us in this exploration. The resulting publication will be a comprehensive survey of the current state of artistic research in this boundary area, highlighting conflicts of process and changes of practice.
We hope that paricipants will find interest in, and bring experience to bear in the following areas
  • Use of the body: Both performance to camera and photographic self-portraiture involve using the body as the subject of the work. Whether through movement, gesture, facial expression, or other means, the body is often central to the artistic expression in both practices.
  • Self-representation: Both performance to camera and photographic self-portraiture involve self-representation. In performance to camera, the performer is often portraying themselves in some way, while in photographic self-portraiture, the artist is creating an image of themselves. Both practices offer opportunities to explore identity and self-expression.
  • Relationship to the camera: Both practices involve a relationship to the camera. In performance to camera, the camera is often used as a tool for recording or broadcasting the performance, while in photographic self-portraiture, the camera is used to create the image. In both cases, the camera can be seen as an extension of the artist's body or as an object of manipulation.
  • The performative aspect: Both performance to camera and photographic self-portraiture involve a performative aspect. In performance to camera, the performer is creating a live or recorded performance, while in photographic self-portraiture, the artist is often creating a posed or staged image. Both practices involve an element of performance or staging.
Overall, performance to camera and photographic self-portraiture share several areas of overlap, particularly in their use of the body, self-representation, relationship to the camera, and the performative aspect. These similarities suggest that there is potential for artists working in both practices to learn from and inform each other's work.

 Next Up

We hope all applicants will engage with this blog, comment constructively, and advise editors if any problems are observed . Of course there can be no guarantee of selection for the final print version though any quotation from their text will be acknowledged.
In this blog each applicant will be listed anonymously prior to any editing / curation process
All submitted material will remain the intellectual property of the applicant and so is printed only with their permission.



Comments

  1. With hindsight, I should have made a better choice of environment to move this project forward. To find a space where artists actually come out of the comfort zone of their own work and thoughts and think about other artists' work in a reflection of themselves.
    Blogger really shows its age in terms of usability and many of our followers have mentioned difficulties in commenting. Some have success in commenting anonymously though this is hardly ideal for the free flow of ideas. Others have found that changing their browser can help e.g. Firefox.
    I was getting messages about 3rd party cookies being blocked and rightly so as the web has become this place where any slimy object tries to get into your PC. I use Google Chrome with nearly all its security features turned on but to make an exception for blogspot. Now I seem to have had success in adding to the list of sites that can always use cookies with antry of "[*.]blogspot.com" and a tickbox exntry of allow third party cookies on this site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're doing a great job starting this conversation and continuing with it. This is an initial process of collection of varying perspectives and perhaps can be collated in a digital book. Keep up the great work.

      Delete
    2. thank you for your comment, we are looking at BlogBooker for this very purpose

      Delete
  2. This comment is from Gen Doy . i can't work out how to use this blog properly as i've never done this before, nor put up a photo and say something about the work i wanted to illustrate but anyway, having read Aldobranti's opening comments i had some thoughts. Is the actualisation of a key self-imaging moment in the performance of a self-portrait or self-image what the artist "sees" and experiences or what the audiences sees? is it a bit of both? also the audience is not a homogenous entity and so different people will experience iconic tableau/images in a performance differently. Also what about the differences between a still image and a still from a moving image piece or a time-based performance? i think these things could be considered as having different meanings. then there is the question of whether a photographic image is a creation or a record/documentation of self-representation. I think if we consider this in a dialectical way then the photographic self-representation is both creation and documentation. At the time that the performer "images herself" i imagine there is a coming together of heightened consciousness of both mind and body which perhaps briefly imprints itself on the creator as if s/he were the film in the camera? so at this point one of the aspects of the dialectical relationship becomes more prominent ie the creative one, but at the same time the recording/documenting aspect does not disappear...maybe this is true even if there is no filmic/photographic record. It was experienced and lived by the artist so it existed irrespective of whether there is an image to "show" this. i wanted to put a still image in here but can't work out how. so here is a link to a vimeo piece performed to the camera, which is the audience. https://vimeo.com/585910420 it's called a conversation about art, where i have a conversation with myself about why make art in a world full of awful events and problems. It also makes reference to the idea of "two brains", one in the skull and one in the gut. Having a "gut feeling" about something is something quite visceral and i wondered if after that feeling the brain then tries to decipher and understand what the "gut feeling" means. Is art more about "gut feelings" than brain feelings?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for expounding on the lines that unite and separate; blurry or defined, in the purpose/vision of this call, creatively speaking, as well as the mechanics of sharing/posting/communicating with this tool.
      Dicho esto, voy a seguir escribiendo en español porque la falta de claridad en este llamado me motiva a hacerlo. Muchas veces me veo en la posición de "revolcar el avispero".
      Todes tenemos mucho que decir sobre nuestro Ser y Estar en el espacio liminal que busca ser captado y materializado en lecturas visuales. Somos la fantasía de nuestras propias ideas en manipulación grafista/comunicativa/expositiva? Estamos en el momento cierto del espacio que diseñamos, o es simplemente la mejor aproximación posible? Opino que la autocrítica retrospectiva de las imágenes que captamos y guardamos nos ayudan a contestar éstas preguntas. Es decir, el factor tiempo en pasado nos detiene a mirar con la óptica del llamado de la convocatoria. Entendí lo que Aldobranti propone y busca? Interpreté la convocatoria a mi estética definida o en progreso? Al momento, puedo contestra éstas preguntas con más preguntas.
      So, what is the curating criteria in this call?
      Thanks for calling my attention. When will my contribution of image and context be published? Let´s breathe and record the waves.
      En Situ Danza

      Delete
    2. Reply to Gen Doy, thanks for comments, quick question Gen, I tried to watch your video, https://vimeo.com/585910420 however I couldn't get the sound to work, what am I doing wrong I wonder?

      Delete
  3. thanks for this question ,
    I think that documentation is something that applies to all arts, but in the case of photography, I think we have to think about the type we are talking about, is it taking pictures of events and a continuous performance, is it another way to document a continuous movement action or a specific event, or is it innovative photography that carries The meaning of the project is artistic, so that the photographer chooses the camera angles and switches the places of characters and sizes in order to reach a specific meaning, and here photography is far from being a documentation for more than that is the process of creation

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

comments are now disabled for this dialogue

Popular posts from this blog

Demeter Dykes

Esther Sabetpour

Mila Romans